McClure v. Rehg

2007 WL 3352389 (2007)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McClure v. Rehg

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
2007 WL 3352389 (2007)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

Alice Ingram (plaintiff) called the City of Jennings police department (defendant) to report that her husband, Walter McClure (plaintiff) had abused her. As the police were en route to the couple’s residence, Ingram called again to report that there had been no incident. The police continued to the residence and entered the home. Once inside, the police arrested McClure. The state then filed criminal charges against McClure, despite Ingram’s request that the state not pursue charges. In response, Ingram and McClure filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Jennings mayor, the prosecutor, the judge, the police chief, and multiple officials and officers with the police department (the city officials) (defendants). Ingram and McClure claimed that the city officials had violated their constitutional rights by pursuing criminal charges against McClure because of the city’s no-drop policy (i.e., a policy under which perpetrators of domestic violence are prosecuted regardless of the victim’s wishes). The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri reviewed the case.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sippel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 790,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership