Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

McConnell v. Hunt Sports Enterprises

Ohio Court of Appeals
725 N.E.2d 1193 (Ohio App. 1999)


Facts

John McConnell (plaintiff) and Lamar Hunt (defendant) were part of a group that formed Columbus Hockey Limited, LLC (CHL) in order to try to obtain a National Hockey League franchise in Columbus. CHL began negotiations with Nationwide Insurance Enterprise (Nationwide) about building an arena, which CHL would then lease. Hunt, purporting to act for CHL, but without consulting other CHL members, repeatedly rejected Nationwide’s lease offers. Nationwide then approached McConnell individually, and McConnell said that if Hunt would not agree to the lease on behalf of CHL, McConnell would individually. Subsequently, McConnell and his individual group signed a lease independently of CHL and Hunt. There was a clause in CHL’s operating agreement which stated that members of CHL had a right to engage in business ventures that may compete with CHL. McConnell then filed suit, seeking a declaratory judgment to establish his right to operate the NHL franchise without CHL or Hunt. Hunt filed a counterclaim, alleging that McConnell violated a fiduciary duty to CHL. The district court directed a verdict in favor of McConnell. Hunt appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Tyack, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 128,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 176 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.