Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

McConnell v. Hunt Sports Enterprises

725 N.E.2d 1193 (1999)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,600+ case briefs...

McConnell v. Hunt Sports Enterprises

Ohio Court of Appeals

725 N.E.2d 1193 (1999)

Facts

John McConnell (plaintiff) and Lamar Hunt (defendant) were part of a group that formed Columbus Hockey Limited, LLC (CHL) in order to try to obtain a National Hockey League franchise in Columbus. CHL began negotiations with Nationwide Insurance Enterprise (Nationwide) about building an arena, which CHL would then lease. Hunt, purporting to act for CHL, but without consulting other CHL members, repeatedly rejected Nationwide’s lease offers. Nationwide then approached McConnell individually, and McConnell said that if Hunt would not agree to the lease on behalf of CHL, McConnell would individually. Subsequently, McConnell and his individual group signed a lease independently of CHL and Hunt. There was a clause in CHL’s operating agreement which stated that members of CHL had a right to engage in business ventures that may compete with CHL. McConnell then filed suit, seeking a declaratory judgment to establish his right to operate the NHL franchise without CHL or Hunt. Hunt filed a counterclaim, alleging that McConnell violated a fiduciary duty to CHL. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of McConnell. Hunt appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tyack, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership