McCormick v. Fund American Companies

26 F.3d 869 (1994)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McCormick v. Fund American Companies

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
26 F.3d 869 (1994)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

William McCormick (plaintiff) was an officer of a subsidiary of Fund American Companies (defendant). When McCormick left the subsidiary, he owned 500,000 shares in Fund American. In January 1990, Fund American began discussions with Allianz, a German insurance company, about the possibility of Allianz purchasing a minority stake in the subsidiary. In May 1990, Fund American told McCormick that it was in talks with an undisclosed company to possibly sell part of the subsidiary, and that the sale might raise Fund American’s stock prices. McCormick sold all his shares back to Fund American for $8 million, at $38 per share. Several months after the buyout, Allianz purchased the subsidiary for $3.3 billion, raising the price of Fund American stock to $50 per share. McCormick filed a lawsuit in federal district court, alleging that Fund American had violated § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and other securities-fraud provisions by making material omissions and representations related to its purchase of his stock. To support his claims, McCormick identified eight omissions and seven misrepresentations that he believed were material. The omissions and misrepresentations involved Fund American’s nondisclosure of Allianz’s identity and the likelihood of the acquisition. Fund American filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that none of the alleged misrepresentations or omissions were material. The district court granted summary judgment for Fund American. McCormick appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership