McCormick v. Kopmann

161 N.E.2d 720 (1959)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
M
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McCormick v. Kopmann

Illinois Appellate Court
161 N.E.2d 720 (1959)

Play video

Facts

On November 21, 1956, Lewis McCormick was killed in a car accident involving his car and a truck driven by Lorence Kopmann (defendant). His widow (plaintiff) brought suit against Kopmann and three other defendants, alleging two alternate claims. The first claim was against Kopmann, alleging that he negligently operated his vehicle, causing McCormick’s death. To recover under this claim, McCormick had to be free of any contributory negligence. The second, alternative claim was against Anna, John, and Mary Huls, who operated the tavern where Lewis McCormick was drinking before the car accident. Mrs. McCormick alleged that the Huls allowed Lewis McCormick to drink to excess and become intoxicated, and as a result of this intoxication, McCormick was involved in the accident that killed him. Although no defendant sought severance, Kopmann moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that the two claims were mutually exclusive and therefore could not stand together. The motion was denied, and the case went to trial. At trial, conflicting evidence was presented regarding McCormick’s sobriety on the night of the accident. The jury returned a verdict against Kopmann, and he appealed, contending that his motion to dismiss was improperly denied.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Reynolds, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 807,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Civil Procedure

Key Terms