McCormick v. McCormick

455 N.E.2d 103, 118 Ill. App. 3d 455, 74 Ill. Dec. 73 (1983)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McCormick v. McCormick

Illinois Appellate Court
455 N.E.2d 103, 118 Ill. App. 3d 455, 74 Ill. Dec. 73 (1983)

Facts

Brooks McCormick, Jr. (Junior) (plaintiff) established a trust in 1964 for assets he received from his grandmother. Junior was both the settlor and beneficiary of the trust. Junior’s father, Brooks McCormick (Senior) (defendant), was a trustee. Charles Schroeder (defendant), the president of Miami Corporation (defendant), a holding company for McCormick family assets, was a trustee from 1978 to 1980. Myron Ratcliffe (defendant), a past president of Miami Corporation, was also a trustee, from 1964 to 1977. The trust directed the trustees to pay Junior income and principal that the trustees considered advisable for Junior’s comfortable maintenance, medical care, and welfare. In 1977 construction of a residence for Junior began on land Junior had purchased from Senior. The trustees negotiated and entered into contracts for the residence’s construction for $398,000. Junior approved two change orders that increased the residence’s cost to $449,542. The trustees authorized additional spending without Junior’s consent, so that the cost of the residence was $1.9 million. Junior filed suit against the trustees and Miami Corporation, claiming that the trustees, their agents, and Miami Corporation committed mismanagement and waste of trust assets. Junior alleged that the residence remained incomplete and that payments were made for incomplete work, duplicate charges, and work that did not satisfy contractual specifications. Junior alleged that the trustees used a more expensive means to finance the construction than an ordinary mortgage. Junior also claimed that the trustees unlawfully delegated judgmental and discretionary functions to agents of Miami Corporation. Junior further demanded an accounting. The trial court dismissed Junior’s complaint, holding that the trustees used their best judgment and that Junior was intimately involved in the residence’s construction. Junior appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Campbell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership