Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
M

McCoy v. Chicago Heights

6 F. Supp. 2d 973 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McCoy v. Chicago Heights

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
6 F. Supp. 2d 973 (1998)

  • Written by Philip Glass, JD

Facts

In 1994, Chicago Heights adopted a six single-member district plan. Under this scheme, African Americans would comprise a majority in two districts. Another district would feature a large Hispanic population. This district plan proposed mayoral election by at-large voting. The mayor would possess substantial executive powers, including in tie-breaking, vetoes, and appointments. A minimum of three-fifths of council members would override a mayoral veto in this system. Voters endorsed this scheme by referendum. However, McCoy and Perkins (plaintiffs) alleged that this scheme violated § 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. In place of Chicago Heights's plan, McCoy and Perkins advanced an aldermanic scheme. Under this plan, seven councilmembers would counteract a mayor with limited executive powers. Voters would select the mayor through an election at large. Historically, Illinois permitted an aldermanic system and cumulative voting through its municipal code.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Coar, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Election Law

Key Terms