From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
McCulloch v. Commonwealth
Virginia Court of Appeals
29 Va.App. 769, 514 S.E.2d 797 (1999)
The Commonwealth of Virginia (plaintiff) prosecuted James C. McCulloch (defendant) for the self-confessed murder of his wife. A Virginia statute required McCulloch, as an indigent defendant, to undergo a mental health evaluation by a court-appointed psychiatrist or other mental health expert. The trial judge appointed a psychologist who evaluated McCulloch and found that he was probably sane when he killed his wife. Nevertheless, McCulloch asserted an insanity defense, and moved to be reevaluated by a second court-appointed expert. McCulloch wanted the judge to appoint the psychiatrist who once treated him for a head wound. McCulloch argued that, unlike the psychologist, the psychiatrist was medically qualified to say how the old wound could have affected McCulloch's more recent behavior. The judge denied the motion because McCulloch had already undergone the single evaluation to which he was entitled and a second evaluation was unlikely to produce a different result, and because McCulloch's former psychiatrist was unqualified to opine on McCulloch's mental condition at the time of the murder. The judge also denied McCulloch's proffer of lay witnesses who could testify that McCulloch struck them as being "crazy" or "depressed" at the time, because McCulloch had not introduced any expert opinion or factual evidence demonstrating his insanity. The jury convicted McCulloch and he appealed to the Virginia Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bumgardner, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.