McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional de Marineros de Honduras

372 U.S. 10, 83 S. Ct. 671, 9 L. Ed. 2d 547 (1963)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional de Marineros de Honduras

United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 10, 83 S. Ct. 671, 9 L. Ed. 2d 547 (1963)

Facts

Empresa Hondurena de Vapores, S.A. (Empresa) was a Honduran company based in Honduras involved in the shipping of tropical produce. The officers and directors of Empresa were Hondurans living in Honduras, and all but one of their seamen were Honduran citizens. However, Empresa was owned entirely by United Fruit Company, a New Jersey corporation, which controlled the appointment of officers and directors of Empresa. The Empresa fleet, all bearing Honduran flags, operated at the direction of United Fruit between ports in Central and South America and the United States. The fleet was essentially folded into United Fruit’s overall shipping fleet. Empresa had a union contract with Sociedad Nacional de Marineros de Honduras (defendant), which was consistent with Honduran law requiring a Honduran union to serve predominantly Honduran workers. In an action filed with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under the National Labor Relations Act, the National Maritime Union of America, AFL-CIO sought to represent the Honduran workers given their frequent presence in United States ports and the control exerted by a United States company, United Fruit. The NLRB applied a weighing-of-interest test and concluded that the contact with the United States outweighed the interests of other countries, including Honduras. The NLRB therefore applied the act and ordered an election to determine which of the two unions, or no union, would represent the Empresa seamen. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia enjoined the order. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Clark, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership