McCulloh v. Drake

24 P.3d 1162 (2001)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McCulloh v. Drake

Wyoming Supreme Court
24 P.3d 1162 (2001)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In December 1997, Gerri E. McCulloh (plaintiff) filed for divorce from John W. Drake (defendant). McCulloh alleged that Drake had physically and sexually abused her throughout their three-year marriage and at one point assaulted her by holding a pillow over her face. In October 1998, while the divorce action was pending, McCulloh filed tort claims against Drake alleging negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress. McCulloh requested a jury trial for the tort claims. The court denied the request and joined the tort claims with the divorce action. The court then held a trial, during which evidence was introduced concerning the divorce matters and the tort claims. In addition to providing evidence of the pillow incident, McCulloh also introduced evidence that Drake had sexually assaulted her. Following the trial, the court issued the divorce decree but concluded that McCulloh had not proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Drake had sexually assaulted her. Additionally, in considering McCulloh’s allegations of negligent and intentional inflict of emotional distress, the court concluded that for all the allegations other than the pillow incident, McCulloh had not established a claim for which relief may be granted, filed timely, or proved by a preponderance of evidence that the incidents had caused distress. Regarding the pillow incident, the court concluded that the incident had occurred and had caused McCulloh distress. The court ordered Drake to pay McCulloh punitive damages. McCulloh and Drake both appealed. McCulloh claimed that the trial court erred by requiring the joinder of her tort claims with the divorce action because, in doing so, the court had denied her the right to a jury trial on the tort claims.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lehman, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 791,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership