McCurdy v. United Mexican States (United States v. Mexico)

4 R.I.A.A 418 (1929)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McCurdy v. United Mexican States (United States v. Mexico)

Mexico/USA General Claims Commission
4 R.I.A.A 418 (1929)

Facts

The United States brought a claim for damages on behalf of its citizen, Walter McCurdy (plaintiff), against the government of Mexico (defendant) for denial of justice and maltreatment in prison. McCurdy, an owner of mines in the state of Sonora, Mexico, alleged that the owner of an adjacent mining property, W. P. Harlow, gifted shares of Harlow’s mining company to a Sonora state official. McCurdy further alleged that Harlow lured McCurdy to come from the United States and visit Sonora, where McCurdy was arrested on false accusations of attempted murder. McCurdy spent several months in prison and was charged with various crimes. McCurdy alleged that the Mexican authorities offered to release McCurdy if he agreed to pay $5,000 and transfer ownership of his mines to Harlow. McCurdy alleged that upon his refusal to transfer ownership, he was subjected to various criminal trials, denied due process, and suffered mistreatment. In sum, McCurdy and the United States alleged that the Mexican officials colluded with Harlow to lure McCurdy to Sonora under false pretenses, have him arrested on sham charges, and subject him to months of imprisonment, all in an effort to force him to sell his mining property to Harlow’s company, in which a Mexican government official held shares. During the arbitration proceedings, the United States offered the affidavits of several witnesses that attested to the power wielded by Harlow in Sonora and his close relationships with local government officials. The United States did not, however, produce any evidence of Harlow’s alleged gift of shares in Harlow’s mining company to the Mexican government official.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (MacGregor, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership