McDaniel v. Kidde Residential and Fire Co.

2015 WL 1326332 (2015)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McDaniel v. Kidde Residential and Fire Co.

United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
2015 WL 1326332 (2015)

Facts

Gretchen McDaniel (plaintiff) was making donuts with her daughter, Alaina (plaintiff) when a pot of cooking oil caught fire. Gretchen attempted to put the fire out using a fire extinguisher manufactured by Kidde Residential & Commercial (Kidde) (defendant), but the fire extinguisher failed. Gretchen handed the fire extinguisher to Alaina and sent her to the front of their home. Gretchen then attempted to carry the pot of burning oil through the laundry room toward an exterior door but dropped the pot and suffered severe burns to her face. Alaina did not see her mother being burned, but there was conflicting evidence as to whether she was near enough to the laundry room to hear or smell the injury as it happened. After her mother was burned, Alaina suffered from ongoing nightmares, was fearful of flames, and was anxious and tense. Alaina did not receive medical treatment for her symptoms. Gretchen sued Kidde for negligence, and Alaina brought a separate claim for emotional distress. Kidde moved for summary judgment as to Alaina’s claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fischer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership