From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
McDermott Inc. v. Lewis
Delaware Supreme Court
531 A.2d 206 (Del. 1987)
Facts
McDermott International (International) was a Panamanian corporation. International owned a subsidiary called McDermott Inc. (McDermott) (defendant), and the McDermott subsidiary was incorporated in Delaware. Although International was the parent and McDermott was the subsidiary, McDermott also owned substantial shares in International, its parent. During a reorganization of International, McDermott voted its International shares of stock to become a 92 percent-owned subsidiary of International. As a result, International’s public stockholders held approximately 90 percent of the voting power while McDermott held about 10 percent of the voting power. The purpose of the reorganization was to avoid United States taxation and to oppose third-party attempts to acquire control of International. Harry Lewis and Nina Altman (plaintiffs) were McDermott stockholders. Lewis and Altman filed consolidated suits to rescind the reorganization in Delaware court, arguing that under Delaware law a subsidiary is not allowed to vote its shares in the subsidiary’s parent corporation. However, International had no operations or contacts in Delaware, and International argued that the transaction was permitted by Panamanian law. The trial court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Lewis and Altman, and McDermott appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.