McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.

427 U.S. 273 (1976)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.

United States Supreme Court
427 U.S. 273 (1976)

Play video

Facts

McDonald and a co-worker (plaintiffs), both white, and a fellow black employee, Charles Jackson, worked at Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. (Santa Fe) (defendant). All three were charged with stealing goods from a large shipment carried by Santa Fe. A week later, the plaintiffs were fired, but Jackson was not. The plaintiffs sued Santa Fe under both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 [a provision derived from the Civil Rights Act of 1866 that protects nonwhite individuals against racial discrimination], alleging unlawful discrimination on the basis of their race. The district court concluded that discharging white employees while retaining a similarly charged black employee did not violate Title VII or § 1981 and dismissed the lawsuit. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed. The plaintiffs petitioned for review by the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership