McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
United States Supreme Court
411 U.S. 792 (1973)
- Written by Nan Futrell, JD
Facts
Green (plaintiff) worked for McDonnell Douglas Corp. (McDonnell) (defendant) in McDonnell’s manufacturing plant for several years as a mechanic and laboratory technician before being laid off amidst general job cuts at the company. Green, a black civil rights activist, believed his firing was racially motivated. Following his termination, Green participated in a staged protest against the company, designed to disrupt its normal business activities. Green was charged with and plead guilty to obstructing traffic. Green subsequently applied for an open mechanic position at McDonnell and was rejected. Green sued McDonnell under § 703(a)(1) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., alleging the company had refused to rehire him because of his race. The district court found that McDonnell refused to rehire Green because of his involvement in the illegal protests against it and that nothing in Title VII prevented it from doing so. The district court dismissed Green’s §703(a)(1) claim. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed that dismissal, and McDonnell filed a petition for review by the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 780,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.