McDowell Valley Vineyards, Inc. v. Sabaté USA Inc.
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
2005 WL 2893848 (2005)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Sabaté USA Inc. (defendant) was the wholly owned, California-based subsidiary of Sabaté SAS (defendant), a wine-cork manufacturer headquartered in France, a country which, like the United States, was signatory to the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG). Sabaté USA Inc. (defendant) marketed its corporate parent’s corks to McDowell Valley Vineyards, Inc. (McDowell) (plaintiff), a California winemaker. Based on Sabaté USA’s representations that the French corks could protect wine against undesirable wine taint, McDowell bought a shipment of the corks and used them to bottle McDowell’s 2000-vintage wines. When McDowell’s customers complained that McDowell’s 2000-vintage wines suffered from wine taint, McDowell passed these complaints on to Sabaté USA, which undertook to investigate the problem on its own and without consulting Sabaté SAS. Throughout this process, Sabaté USA’s correspondence with McDowell used only Sabaté USA’s own letterhead, which listed only Sabaté USA’s California address and telephone number. When this correspondence failed to rectify the wine-taint problem, McDowell sued Sabaté USA and Sabaté SAS for breach of warranty and other business misconduct in a California court. The Sabaté firms removed the case to federal court and moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Conti, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.