McFadden v. United States
United States Supreme Court
135 S. Ct. 2298, 192 L. Ed. 2d 260 (2015)
- Written by Sara Adams, JD
Facts
Federal agents began investigating a store for selling bath salts, a type of recreational drug. The store owner agreed to assist the investigators by making a purchase of controlled substances from her supplier, Stephen McFadden (defendant). McFadden advertised his products under names related to controlled substances, including “speed,” and compared them to recreational drugs. McFadden marked his products as “not for human consumption” and noted on the labels that the products did not contain certain compounds or analogues of those compounds. The packages sent from McFadden to the store owner contained small plastic bags of powder. These powders were tested and confirmed to produce the same effects as several controlled substances if consumed. McFadden was indicted and tried in federal district court on charges that included the distribution of controlled-substance analogues. McFadden argued at trial that he did not know that the substances he sold as bath salts were regulated under the Controlled Substances Analogue Enforcement Act of 1986 (the act). The government (plaintiff) and McFadden disagreed about proper mental-state requirement under the act. The district court ultimately issued a jury instruction stating that under the act, McFadden could be found guilty if the jury determined that McFadden knowingly distributed a substance for human consumption, even if McFadden was not aware that the substance was an analogue of a controlled substance. The jury convicted McFadden, and McFadden appealed. The court of appeals affirmed the district court, and McFadden appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
Concurrence (Roberts, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.