McFarland v. Miller
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
14 F.3d 912 (1994)
- Written by Meredith Hamilton Alley, JD
Facts
George McFarland (plaintiff) was an actor who played the character Spanky in the Our Gang movies. Over the years, McFarland claimed, he became closely associated with the Spanky character and even became known as Spanky McFarland. Throughout his career, McFarland received income from licensing and other uses of the name Spanky McFarland. Joseph Miller (defendant) was the primary shareholder and president of a company that owned and operated a restaurant named Spanky McFarland’s. The restaurant décor featured large murals depicting the Our Gang characters, including Spanky, and the menu referred to Our Gang characters’ names. Miller testified in his deposition that he knew that the name of the restaurant was the same as that of the actor who portrayed the Our Gang character, but that he chose the name because Spanky was once a nickname of Miller’s son and Miller thought McFarland sounded Irish. McFarland sued Miller, alleging that Miller had infringed on McFarland’s right of publicity to exploit the name Spanky McFarland. Miller filed a motion for summary judgment. The district court granted the motion, holding that McFarland’s interest in exploiting the name was limited because Spanky was a character that McFarland portrayed and the studio that produced the Our Gang movies had a superior interest in the right of publicity of the character. McFarland appealed, then died while the appeal was pending.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hutchinson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.