MCI v. Logan Group, Inc.
United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
848 F.Supp 86 (1994)
MCI Telecommunications Corporation (MCI) (plaintiff) sued The Logan Group, Inc. and Communications Specialties, Inc. (CSI) (defendants) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for unpaid telephone services. Fidelity intervened under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 24(a) as assignee of CSI’s accounts receivable. Fidelity claimed breach of contract and fraud because MCI gave assurances that the accounts would be paid, but did not pay. The court did not believe Fidelity was entitled to intervention as a matter of right, but allowed the unopposed intervention because there was a shared question of fact. Fidelity amended its complaint to include promissory and equitable estoppel claims against MCI. Fidelity’s claims were rooted in state law, but in pleadings Fidelity asserted federal question jurisdiction. There was no diversity of citizenship, because both Fidelity and MCI were incorporated in Delaware. Thus, the court ordered Fidelity to show cause why federal jurisdiction of proper.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Mahon, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.