From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
McIntosh v. Arkansas Republican Party-Frank White Election Committee
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
766 F.2d 337 (1985)
Robert McIntosh (plaintiff), a Black political activist, bought a ticket to a luncheon in the Little Rock Convention Center’s banquet hall honoring Arkansas governor Frank White. The luncheon was sponsored by the Frank White Election Committee (defendant) and the Arkansas Republican Party (defendant). McIntosh sent a letter to White demanding to speak at the luncheon. Curtis Finch, Jr., the luncheon’s organizer, was concerned because McIntosh had not been invited to speak, he was one of White’s most vocal opponents, and he had sent harassing articles to White. Furthermore, McIntosh had disrupted other events with unsolicited and unwelcome speeches. Before McIntosh could enter the banquet hall, Finch informed him that he was not allowed to attend and offered him a full refund. However, McIntosh refused and insisted that he had the right to attend. The exchange between McIntosh and Finch became heated but did not lead to shouting. Then two state troopers providing security, who were aware that McIntosh might try to disrupt the event, informed McIntosh that he could not attend and asked him to leave. The officers further told McIntosh that if he insisted on entering the banquet hall, he would be arrested. McIntosh replied that the officers should take him to jail. The officers then arrested McIntosh and took him to the North Little Rock jail, where he was charged with disorderly conduct. He was detained and interrogated for two hours until the luncheon ended. McIntosh sued the Frank White Election Committee and the Arkansas Republican Party for false arrest and false imprisonment. The district court dismissed McIntosh’s claims. McIntosh also brought a § 1983 claim based on false arrest, but the district court did not rule on that claim. McIntosh appealed the legal standard of recovery applied by the district court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Fagg, J.)
Concurrence (Gibson, J.)
Concurrence (Lay, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.