McIntosh v. Murphy
Supreme Court of Hawaii
52 Haw. 29, 469 P.2d 177 (1970)
- Written by Megan Schwarz, JD
Facts
On Saturday, April 25, 1964, George Murphy (defendant) made a verbal job offer to Dick McIntosh (plaintiff), a Los Angeles resident, to be an assistant manager at a car dealership in Honolulu. Murphy stated that McIntosh would begin work on Monday, April 27, 1964. McIntosh accepted the job and moved some of his belongings to Honolulu and forwent any other employment opportunities. After two and a half months of working, Murphy discharged McIntosh for being unable to close deals with prospective customers. McIntosh sued Murphy for breach of the oral employment contract. The jury returned a verdict for McIntosh in the sum of $12,103.40. Murphy appealed, arguing that McIntosh cannot maintain an action on the alleged oral employment contract in light of the Statute of Frauds, which makes oral contracts that cannot be performed within one year unenforceable.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Levinson, J.)
Dissent (Abe, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.