Supreme Court of Hawaii
469 P.2d 177 (1970)
On Saturday, April 25, 1964, George Murphy (defendant) made a verbal job offer to Dick McIntosh (plaintiff), a Los Angeles resident, to be an assistant manager at a car dealership in Honolulu. Murphy stated that McIntosh would begin work on Monday, April 27, 1964. McIntosh accepted the job and moved some of his belongings to Honolulu and forwent any other employment opportunities. After two and a half months of working, Murphy discharged McIntosh for being unable to close deals with prospective customers. McIntosh sued Murphy for breach of the oral employment contract. The jury returned a verdict for McIntosh in the sum of $12,103.40. Murphy appealed, arguing that McIntosh cannot maintain an action on the alleged oral employment contract in light of the Statute of Frauds, which makes oral contracts that cannot be performed within one year unenforceable.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Levinson, J.)
Dissent (Abe, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.