Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

McKart v. United States

United States Supreme Court
395 U.S. 185 (1969)


Facts

A Selective Service draft board classified Jack McKart (defendant) as exempt from military service under the Selective Service Act of 1948 (Act), 50 U.S.C. § 456(o), which provided an exemption for sole surviving sons of veterans who had been killed in action. The draft board later incorrectly reclassified McKart as immediately eligible to serve, and ordered McKart to report for a medical exam as part of his induction. Because McKart objected to the Vietnam War, he declined to appeal his reclassification to a state appeal board (board). At the time McKart was reclassified, draft registrants were not required to appeal their classifications to the board. After McKart failed to appear for his scheduled medical exam, he was federally charged and indicted for failing to report for service. McKart attempted to argue that he was exempt from service because his original classification had been correct. The district court ruled that McKart could not assert the exemption defense, because he had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. McKart was convicted and sentenced to three years in prison. The court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence (White, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence (Douglas, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.