McKaskle v. Wiggins
United States Supreme Court
465 U.S. 168 (1984)
Carl Wiggins (defendant) was convicted of robbery and sentenced to life in prison, but because of a faulty indictment, Wiggins's conviction was set aside, and he was granted a new trial. Two months before his second trial began, Wiggins filed a request for the court to appoint him counsel. The court appointed an attorney to represent him. A month later, Wiggins filed another request for counsel to be appointed, and the court appointed him another attorney. However, during pretrial proceedings for the second trial, Wiggins said he would be defending himself pro se and asked that counsel not be allowed to interfere with his presentations to the court. Throughout Wiggins's trial, he kept changing his mind about whether he wanted the assistance of his standby counsel. At times, Wiggins said he wanted no assistance, but at other times, Wiggins consulted with his counsel and allowed them to question witnesses and make statements on his behalf. The jury convicted Wiggins, and he moved for a new trial, arguing that his standby counsel had unfairly interfered with his presentation of his defense. After exhausting his state appeals and state habeas corpus review, Wiggins filed a federal habeas corpus petition. The district court denied his petition, but the appellate court reversed, concluding that Wiggins's Sixth Amendment right to represent himself was violated by his standby counsels' interference in the proceedings. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
Dissent (White, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.