McKee v. William H. Cosby, Jr.
United States Supreme Court
586 U.S. ___ (2019)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
In 2014, Kathrine McKee (plaintiff) publicly accused actor Bill Cosby (defendant) of raping her 40 years prior. McKee alleged that Cosby’s attorney retaliated by writing and leaking a letter containing defamatory information about her personal life and character. McKee filed suit in federal court for a state-law defamation claim. The case was dismissed. On appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, the court held that by disclosing the accusation to a reporter, McKee became a limited-purpose public figure. Public figures are not entitled to damages for defamation unless they can meet the difficult showing that the statement was made with actual malice. McKee failed to meet her burden. She appealed to the United States Supreme Court, requesting review of her classification as a limited-purpose public figure.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
Concurrence (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
