McKnight v. Basilides
Washington Supreme Court
143 P.2d 307 (1943)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Alice and Charles Basilides (defendant) were married in 1901. Mrs. Basilides had two children from a previous marriage, Alice McKnight and Fred King (plaintiffs). Mrs. and Mr. Basilides had a child together, Ruth Allison (plaintiff). The family purchased two houses in Seattle. The first was located at 5203 First Avenue and was known to the family as the big house. The second, at 326 West Forty-First Street, was known as the little house. Mrs. Basilides died intestate in 1929, and her estate was never probated. After Mrs. Basilides’s death, Mr. Basilides lived in the big house and rented out the little house until it was sold on a partial-payment sales contract in 1938. Mr. Basilides maintained and made improvements to both properties and paid all of the taxes and assessments. More than two decades after their mother’s death, Alice McKnight and her brother Fred King brought an action to partition the two properties and for an accounting against Mr. Basilides’s use of and income from the property. The lower court found that Alice and Fred each held a one-sixth interest in both properties, performed an accounting against Mr. Basilides for his use of the properties over the years, and decreed that the big house should be sold for partition. Judgment of default was entered against Ruth, and Mr. Basilides appealed and alleged that he had already obtained exclusive title to both properties through adverse possession.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Simpson, C.J.)
Dissent (Mallery, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.