Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

McLaughlin v. Fellows Gear Shaper Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
786 F.2d 592 (1986)


Facts

Wilbur McLaughlin (Wilbur) and his wife (plaintiffs) sued Fellows Gear Shaper Co. (FGS) (defendant) after Wilbur’s thumb was amputated while he used a machine manufactured by FGS. Wilbur was standing on top of the machine when he was injured. The McLaughlins argued that the machine was defective in that it should have included an automatic shutoff or an “interlock” so as to prevent the type of injury suffered by Wilbur. In its defense, FGS asserted that it was not liable because it could not foresee that a person might stand on the machine and, in the alternative, because Wilbur had assumed the risk of harm. At trial, the court submitted special interrogatories to the jury, asking them to answer (1) whether the machine was defective, (2) if so, whether the defect proximately caused Wilbur’s injury, (3) whether it was foreseeable to FGS that an operator of the machine might stand on it, (4) whether Wilbur assumed the risk of injury, and (5) what damages should be awarded if a verdict were rendered in the McLaughlins’ favor. The jury answered “yes” to questions (1), (2), and (4), and “no” to question (3). It then awarded the McLaughlins $120,000 in damages under question (5). After hearing the jury’s answers, the McLaughlins moved for a mistrial and FGS moved for judgment in its favor. The court denied both motions and instead submitted supplemental interrogatories to the jury: was Wilbur’s standing on the machine a substantial factor in causing his injury, and was it the sole cause of his injury. The jury answered “no” to both questions. In court, the jury confirmed aloud that they intended to find for the McLaughlins. The court set aside the jury’s finding that Wilbur assumed the risk of harm and entered judgment in the McLaughlins’ favor. FGS appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Mansmann, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Adams, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.