Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

McLaughlin v. Tilendis

398 F.2d 287 (1968)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...

McLaughlin v. Tilendis

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

398 F.2d 287 (1968)

Facts

John Steele and James McLaughlin (plaintiffs) were employed as probationary teachers by a public-school district in Cook County, Illinois. The district did not rehire Steele for a second year of teaching and dismissed McLaughlin before the end of his second school year. Steele and McLaughlin alleged that the school district had ended their employment because Steele and McLaughlin were members of Local 1663 of the American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO (the teachers’ union). There was no evidence that Steele or McLaughlin had ever engaged in any strikes or illegal picketing as members of the teachers’ union. Steele and McLaughlin sued district superintendent Albert Tilendis and members of the district’s board of education (the district officials) (defendants), seeking $100,000 each for an alleged violation of their First Amendment rights of free association. The district officials moved to dismiss the complaint, and the district court granted the motion after finding that Steele and McLaughlin had no First Amendment rights to form or join a labor union. The court stated that unions might engage in strikes or other activity that could affect the government’s ability to function and noted that courts should not interfere with the government’s discretion in choosing how to handle its relations with unions and their members. Steele and McLaughlin appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cummings, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,700 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership