McMillen v. Itawamba County School District
United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
702 F. Supp. 2d 699 (2010)
- Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD
Facts
Constance McMillen (plaintiff) was a senior at Itawamba Agricultural High School (the school) in Itawamba County School District (the district) (defendant). McMillen had been open about being a lesbian since the eighth grade. In 2010, McMillen asked her girlfriend to the school prom, and her girlfriend accepted. McMillen asked Rick Mitchell, the assistant principal, for permission to attend the prom with her girlfriend. Mitchell rejected the request and told McMillen that McMillen and her girlfriend could attend only with male dates. McMillen asked Principal Trae Wiygul and Superintendent Teresa McNeese for permission to bring her girlfriend and wear a tuxedo. Wiygul and McNeese rejected her request, telling McMillen that the girls could not slow dance and had to wear dresses. McMillen contacted the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and the ACLU wrote a letter to the school demanding a change in policy. The school canceled the prom, and the parents privately organized and funded a separate prom. McMillen sued the district, seeking a preliminary injunction and alleging that the school had violated the First Amendment of the United States Constitution by refusing to allow same-sex couples to attend the prom.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Davidson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.