MCorp Financial, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

900 F.2d 852 (1990)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

MCorp Financial, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
900 F.2d 852 (1990)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the board) (defendant) had supervisory control over the formation and operation of bank holding companies and their subsidiaries. Acquisition of control of a bank required prior approval by the board. The board was to consider the financial and managerial resources and prospects of the entities involved. In 1984, the board revised Regulation Y, which pertained to bank holding companies. The revised Regulation Y provided that a bank holding company must serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary banks. In 1987, the board published a policy statement related to Regulation Y. The policy statement provided that a bank holding company ought to remain ready to use financial resources to provide adequate funds to its subsidiary banks during times of financial stress. Further, the policy statement provided that the failure of a bank holding company to serve as a source of strength for its subsidiary bank could be considered an unsound banking practice or a violation of Regulation Y. MCorp Financial, Incorporated (MCorp) (plaintiff) was a bank holding company. The board brought an administrative proceeding against MCorp, alleging, among other claims, that MCorp failed to act as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks. The board sought to cause MCorp to transfer funds from itself to its troubled subsidiary banks. MCorp sued the board in the district court, moving to enjoin the board’s administrative proceeding against it. The district court granted the motion. The board appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Davis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership