From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
McQuade v. Stoneham
Court of Appeals of New York
189 N.E. 234 (1934)
Stoneham (defendant) was the majority owner of National Exhibition Company (NEC). McGraw (defendant) and McQuade (plaintiff) each bought 70 shares of Stoneham’s stock. As part of the purchase, the three entered into a contract that provided that the parties would “use their best endeavors” to make sure that each would remain directors of NEC. Stoneham became president of the board, McGraw vice-president, and McQuade treasurer. Stoneham selected and controlled the other four directors. McQuade and Stoneham began quarreling about the corporate treasury. At a board meeting at which the position of treasurer was up for election, Stoneham and McGraw did not vote, McQuade voted for himself, and the four other directors voted for a Leo Bondy to succeed McQuade; McQuade thus lost his position as treasurer. At the next board meeting, the board dropped McQuade as a director. McQuade's removal was due to personal conflict with Stoneham, not for any misconduct by McQuade. McQuade brought suit for breach of contract, alleging that Stoneham and McGraw did not use their best efforts to keep him on as a director. The defendants claimed that the contract was void because the duty to act in the best interests of the corporation superseded the contract.The lower courts did not reinstate McQuade as treasurer but did award him damages for the breach.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Pound, C.J.)
Concurrence (Lehman, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.