McRoberts v. Transouth Financial (In re Bell)

194 B.R. 192 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McRoberts v. Transouth Financial (In re Bell)

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Illinois
194 B.R. 192 (1996)

Facts

Tod and Colleen Marmino borrowed money from Laclede Credit Union (Laclede) to buy a truck. As security, the Marminos gave Laclede a lien on the truck. Consistent with its regular practice, Laclede provided the car dealership with the necessary information to record the lien and forward the certificate of title to the Secretary of State, as required to perfect its interest. However, the car dealership failed to note Laclede’s lien on the truck’s certificate of title. Thereafter, the Marminos filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court considered this case and other factually similar Illinois cases in which the debtors (the Borrowers) borrowed money from the creditors (the Lenders) to purchase vehicles, and the Lenders’ interests were not noted on the vehicles’ certificates of title. In each case, the bankruptcy trustee sought to avoid the Lender’s lien as an unperfected security interest pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 544(a). The Lenders argued that the bankruptcy court should deem their interests perfected in equity. The Lenders also argued that the bankruptcy trustees lack standing and that the Lenders’ interests remain enforceable against the Borrowers.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Meyers, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership