Medical Supply Chain, Inc. v. US Bancorp N.A.

2003 WL 21479192 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Medical Supply Chain, Inc. v. US Bancorp N.A.

United States District Court for the District of Kansas
2003 WL 21479192 (2003)

Facts

Medical Supply Chain, Inc. (Medical) (plaintiff) developed a certification program for healthcare supplies. U.S. Bancorp N.A. (bank) (defendant) was a bank holding company. Medical sued the bank, claiming, among other things, that the bank violated the USA PATRIOT Act (Patriot Act). Specifically, Medical alleged that the bank (1) failed to train its employees regarding the Patriot Act, (2) failed to provide a compliance officer relating to the Patriot Act, (3) misused its authority and used excessive force as enforcement officers under the Patriot Act, and (4) violated criminal laws to influence public policy under the Patriot Act. Medical’s complaint did not allege that the bank engaged in joint action with any state officials. The bank moved to dismiss Medical’s Patriot Act claims for failing to state a claim. The court also considered whether Medical had standing to pursue its Patriot Act claims and whether Medical had the right to pursue a private suit to enforce the Patriot Act. With respect to its right to pursue a private suit, Medical invoked 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which allowed individuals who were deprived of their legal rights under color of state law to pursue private litigation to vindicate their rights. In opposing the bank’s motion to dismiss, Medical first asserted, in conclusory fashion, that the bank acted as an agent of the federal government.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Murguia, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership