Medina v. Resor
United States Court of Military Appeals
20 USCMA 403, 43 CMR 243 (1971)
- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
Medina (plaintiff) was one of several military personnel accused of massacring civilians during Vietnam’s My Lai Massacre. Medina filed suit against Resor (defendant) and other military prosecutors and officers claiming that Resor and the others were engaged in a conspiracy to court-martial Medina and deprive Medina of a fair trial. Specifically, Medina argued that the investigating officer who investigated the massacre admitted into evidence many unsworn statements against Medina. Medina also argued that Medina should have been called as a witness in another trial related to the massacre.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.