Meese v. Keene

481 U.S. 465 (1987)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Meese v. Keene

United States Supreme Court
481 U.S. 465 (1987)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

The Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (the act) was enacted to protect the security and foreign relations of the United States by requiring individuals to disclose any political propaganda that the individual wanted to distribute in the country. The act was created in response to investigations by the House Un-American Activities Committee into Nazi propaganda. Public disclosure was meant to protect the public by giving the public the opportunity to evaluate the background of the material. Political propaganda was defined in the act as being any oral, visual, or written communication that was intended to indoctrinate, convert, or influence a person in the United States with the political or public interests of a foreign government. Barry Keene (plaintiff), a member of the California State Senate, wanted to show three films about nuclear war and acid rain that were produced in Canada. To satisfy the act, Keene would have been required to send the films with a description of their contents to Edwin Meese, the United States attorney general (defendant). Keene would also have to provide any viewers of the films with a letter explaining that the films were registered with the attorney general under the act and that the contents of the films were not necessarily approved by the United States government. The act did not, however, require that the letter explicitly label the material as political propaganda. Keene challenged the act in district court, alleging that his reputation would suffer if he were required to exhibit the films under the requirements of the act. The district court held that the act violated the First Amendment by regulating content deemed to be political propaganda and thereby restricting freedom of speech. The district court reasoned that labeling material as political propaganda would place the material outside acceptable public discourse. The government appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

Dissent (Blackmun, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership