From our private database of 31,100+ case briefs...
Mejia v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
916 A.2d 900 (2007)
Rodrigo Mejia (defendant) was charged with misdemeanor sexual abuse of his nine-year-old niece J.C. Before trial, J.C. recanted her allegations, but the prosecutor warned her she could get in trouble for lying and played a tape of her interview with a police detective. J.C. testified at trial that the abuse had occurred. On redirect, J.C. explained that she had recanted because she loved her cousins, she did not want anything bad to happen to her uncle, and her grandmother said her uncle could be sent back to El Salvador. The judge found Mejia guilty, articulated reasons for the verdict, said she was “prepared to go to sentencing,” and asked for a pretrial-services report. A discussion ensued about when to schedule the sentencing hearing, and the judge said she thought the verdict would disrupt the Mejia family dynamics. The judge commented that perhaps she was not clear about some cultural issues. She said, “in countries like El Salvador and even . . . in frankly places in the surrounding jurisdiction, there are very young girls who are 12 and 13, 14 and 15 who are married of black descent.” The judge said she was unclear and did not know but maybe counsel could help and clarified that she was not suggesting that sexualizing young girls at a very early age was “cultural in general” but did not know if it was going on in Mejia’s case. The judge continued that she did not know when Mejia came to this country, how long he had been in El Salvador, or what his immigration status was, but she invited counsel to explain it or defer sentencing until a later time. Mejia appealed his conviction arguing the judge’s statements showed bias or prejudice based on national origin.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Nebeker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 556,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 556,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 31,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.