Mellon Bank, N.A. v. General Electric Credit Corp.

724 F. Supp. 360 (1989)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mellon Bank, N.A. v. General Electric Credit Corp.

United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
724 F. Supp. 360 (1989)

SC

Facts

Woodings Consolidated Industries, Inc. (Woodings) sold General Electric Credit Corporation (GECC) (defendant) a piece of machinery that GECC leased back to Woodings. Together with this lease agreement, Woodings secured a standby letter of credit with Mellon Bank, N.A. (Mellon) (plaintiff) for $600,000. GECC was the beneficiary. GECC was permitted to draw on the letter of credit with a statement that the amount demanded by GECC was due and owed by Woodings. Subsequently, Woodings failed to make a monthly payment of approximately $15,000 to GECC under the lease agreement. GECC sought to collect the $600,000 under the letter of credit and presented the required documentation to Mellon, including a statement that the amount was due and owing. GECC did not declare Woodings to be in default, which would have triggered the lease agreement’s acceleration clause. Mellon paid GECC the $600,000. Mellon then sued GECC, claiming that Woodings was not in default of the lease agreement and the $600,000 was not due and owing. Both parties moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cohill, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership