Mellos v. Silverman
Alabama Supreme Court
367 So. 2d 1369 (1979)
Thomas and Anthi Mellos (defendants) entered into a brokerage contract with real estate broker Joel Silverman (plaintiff) to sell their restaurant. That contract expired with no sale, and the Melloses signed a brokerage contract with Associates Realty, Inc. (plaintiff). In this contract, Associates Realty agreed to list the restaurant for a period of time. If the property sold during the listing period, Associates Realty would receive a commission. Under the contract’s extension clause, if the property sold after the listing period, but Associates Realty had either introduced the buyer to the Melloses or caused the buyer to be interested in the restaurant during the listing period, Associates Realty was entitled to a commission. During the listing period in the Associates Realty contract, Nikola Nikolic (defendant) learned about the restaurant listing from Silverman. Silverman helped Nikolic prepare a purchase offer. With permission from Associates Realty, Silverman acted as Associates Realty’s agent and presented the offer to the Melloses. The Melloses countered with a higher offer, which Nikolic declined. When the listing period in the Associates Realty contract expired, the Melloses signed a new brokerage contract with a third broker. Several weeks later, the Melloses were motivated by health issues to contact Nikolic directly with a sale offer that was less than Nikolic’s original offer. Nikolic accepted this offer and purchased the restaurant. The third broker told the Melloses that they did not owe him any commission. The Melloses did not pay any commission to Silverman or Associates Realty, either. Silverman and Associates Realty sued the Melloses and Nikolic, seeking a commission for the sale. The trial court found that, under the terms of the extension clause, Associates Realty and Silverman were entitled to a commission. The Melloses appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Torbert, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 709,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 709,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.