Mempa v. Rhay
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 128 (1967)
- Written by Matthew Kay, JD
Facts
Mempa (defendant) was convicted of the offense of joyriding and placed on probation for two years on the condition that he first spend 30 days in the county jail, after which his sentencing was deferred. Four months later, the prosecuting attorney moved that Mempa’s probationary status be revoked because Mempa was involved in a burglary. At the hearing for the burglary, Mempa, then 17 years old, was accompanied by his stepfather, but was without counsel and had not been asked whether he wished to have counsel appointed. At the hearing, Mempa admitted participating in the burglary. A probationary officer testified that he had information that Mempa had been involved in the burglary, but that Mempa had earlier denied any involvement. No one cross-examined the probationary officer. The court revoked Mempa’s probationary status and he was sentenced to 10 years in the penitentiary.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
