Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Mendez v. Draham

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
182 F. Supp. 2d 430 (2002)


Facts

Through their attorney, Samuel Malat, Mendez and others (plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit in federal court against 29 state and federal officials, in their individual and official capacities, as well as numerous state and federal institutional entities (defendants). The plaintiffs sought relief under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985-86, and 1988, alleging numerous constitutional violations as well as state and common law claims. The complaint ran 392 pages in length, contained no index or table of contents, and comprised 1,020 numbered paragraphs. Certain allegations were repeated over and over for each plaintiff, claim, and set of defendants. Counsel for the state defendants informed Malat that many claims appeared to be frivolous, especially the § 1983 claims asserted against federal defendants, state entities, and state officers acting in their official capacities. Counsel further asserted that the complaint violated Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP). If Malat failed to remedy the defects, the state defendants said they would move for sanctions under FRCP 11. After giving Malat additional time to make corrections, which he failed to do, the state defendants moved to strike the complaint and asked for sanctions. Within the previous 18 months, Malat had twice received Rule 11 sanctions, including fines, an order to take continuing legal education courses, and an order to write a 20-page summary of Rule 11.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Orlofsky, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.