Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Mendez v. Westminster School District of Orange County

64 F. Supp. 544 (1946)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...

Mendez v. Westminster School District of Orange County

United States District Court for the Southern District of California

64 F. Supp. 544 (1946)

Facts

Various school districts in Orange County, California, had a practice of segregating elementary school children who spoke English from the children who spoke Spanish. In the Westminster School District of Orange County (Westminster) (defendant), the board of trustees established that elementary school children would not be segregated based on race. However, children who did not speak English could not attend school with English-speaking students. Almost all the non-English-speaking students were of Mexican ancestry. The Mexican students were required to attend separate schools until they were proficient in English. The separate schools for the Spanish-speaking children were equal to the regular schools in facilities, teachers, and curricula. Officials assigned Mexican children to the segregated schools sometimes on the basis of hasty or unreliable language tests. Sometimes, the assignment was simply based on the child’s Mexican name. Westminster and the other school districts admitted that Mexican children such as the child of Gonzalo Mendez (plaintiff) were subjected to segregation through the sixth or eighth grade, and that the children were competent to go to school in the districts where they lived. Mendez and several others brought a class-action suit seeking to have their children attend the local public school. Mendez alleged that the school policy of segregation based on language was a veiled effort by school officials to discriminate against Mexican children, and that such discrimination was present in Westminster and the other school districts with these policies.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McCormick, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership