Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. of Fargo v. United States
United States District Court for the District of North Dakota
272 F. Supp. 409 (1967)
- Written by Nicole Gray , JD
Facts
Eloise A. Newgard was shot and killed by her husband (Newgard) while he was on work leave from a Veteran’s Administration Hospital at Fort Meade, South Dakota (VA) (defendant), where he was being treated for paranoid schizophrenia and psychosis. In January 1965, Newgard was committed to a state hospital by his county’s mental-health board after he became delusional at home, prompting Eloise to call the family’s physician, who recommended the commitment. Three months later, Newgard was transferred to the VA because he was a veteran. At the VA, Newgard was placed under the direct supervision of Dr. Leonard S. Linnell, a psychiatrist who treated Newgard with tranquilizers and saw him weekly along with a clinical psychologist. Newgard was also sent to a vocational psychologist, who started Newgard with various jobs around the hospital to test his job aptitudes. Newgard remained delusional while at the VA and wrote disturbing letters revealing homicidal tendencies, which were ignored. After being at the VA three months, Newman was released by Dr. Linnell to work on a ranch for rehabilitation. The VA’s vocational psychologist made the arrangements with the ranchers to provide work for Newgard, but he provided no guidance for the inexperienced ranchers and placed no restrictions on Newgard. The ranchers were only told that Newgard had had a mental breakdown. A week after working at the ranch and given no restrictions, Newgard left for the weekend, drove to where Eloise was staying, and killed her. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. of Fargo (Merchants) (plaintiff) represented the estate of Eloise Newgard, suing the government for negligently treating Newgard under the Federal Torts Claim Act.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Davies, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.