Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
706 P.2d 523 (1985)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Mercury Investment Co. (Mercury) (plaintiff) leased space in its multi-tenant shopping center to F.W. Woolworth Co. (Woolworth) (defendant) in 1959. Under Mercury’s merchandising plan, Woolworth was intended to be an “anchor tenant” that would attract shoppers for the mutual benefit of all the shopping center’s tenants. Woolworth’s lease was for fifteen years and provided for an annual minimum rent of $19,350 for the first 14 years and $17,425 thereafter. It also provided for additional rent, calculated by taking a percentage of Woolworth’s gross receipts in excess of a specified base amount. Woolworth’s gross receipts never exceeded the specified base amount and therefore, Woolworth never paid additional percentage rent. In 1981, Mercury brought suit to terminate the lease with Woolworth, arguing that Woolworth breached an implied covenant to diligently operate its business in order to generate percentage rent and to attract customers to the shopping center. The trial court granted summary judgment in Woolworth’s favor. The Court of Appeals reversed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Opala, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.