Mercy Hospital of Buffalo
National Labor Relations Board
336 N.L.R.B. 1282 (2001)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
Catholic Health System owned five hospitals in New York, including Mercy Hospital of Buffalo (Mercy) (defendant) and Our Lady of Victoria Hospital (Victoria). A labor union (the union) (plaintiff) had a collective-bargaining agreement with Mercy. At one point in time, all magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI) ordered by doctors at Mercy took place at a certain medical park, and the union represented the MRI technologists who worked at the medical park. In 1997, Mercy, Victoria, and Abbott Radiology (Abbott) discussed the formation of a joint venture to purchase a new, technologically advanced MRI machine. Following the discussions, two new companies were formed: MRI Associates, LLC (owned 25 percent, 25 percent, and 50 percent, respectively, by Mercy, Victoria, and Abbott) and Southtowns (owned 50/50 by Mercy and Victoria). Mercy leased land to MRI Associates, which constructed a building. MRI Associates purchased and installed the new MRI machine in the building. Southtowns leased the building and the new machine from MRI Associates. Abbott, through its wholly owned subsidiary Orchard Park, managed and operated the new MRI machine at the Southtowns facility. The MRI employees at Southtowns were employed by Orchard Park. Thereafter, Mercy began scheduling all its MRI scans at Southtowns and discontinued MRI at the medical park. Two full-time MRI-technologist positions were eliminated at the medical park. The union filed a grievance against Mercy with the National Labor Relations Board (the board), complaining of Mercy’s failure to apply their collective-bargaining agreement to the employees providing MRI services at Southtowns. An administrative law judge found that Mercy and Southtowns were a single employer with no separate corporate identity. The board reviewed the matter.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (No information provided)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.