Merge Claim (United States v. Italy)
Italian–United States Conciliation Commission
14 R.I.A.A. 236 (1955)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Mrs. F. S. Mergé was born in the United States (plaintiff). In 1933, Mrs. Mergé married an Italian man and moved to Italy (defendant). Under Italian law, Mrs. Mergé therefore became a naturalized citizen. The couple resided in Italy until 1937, when they moved to Italy so that Mrs. Mergé’s husband could take a post at the Italian embassy in Tokyo. After the conclusion of World War II, Mrs. Mergé declined being returned to the United States by military authorities. In 1946, the United States issued Mrs. Mergé a passport for travel to the United States. Mrs. Mergé remained there visiting her parents for a period of 10 months and then returned to Italy with her husband. Upon return, Mrs. Mergé was granted a visa to enter Italy as a visitor. In 1950, Mrs. Mergé obtained a new American passport from the embassy in Rome. In the application, Mrs. Mergé stated that she planned to return to the United States permanently. Mrs. Mergé submitted a claim via the United States government for compensation from the Italian government for certain property lost during the war. The Italian government contended that this request should be rejected because Mrs. Mergé was an Italian national not entitled to compensation pursuant to the Peace Treaty of 1947.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.