Meriwether v. Faulkner

821 F.2d 408 (1987)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Meriwether v. Faulkner

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
821 F.2d 408 (1987)

Facts

Lavarita Meriwether (plaintiff) was convicted of murder and was serving a prison sentence. Meriwether was a transgender woman who had been diagnosed with gender dysphoria. Meriwether had taken estrogen therapy and received surgical augmentation. But prison officials treated Meriwether as an anatomical male. A prison doctor allegedly made humiliating remarks to Meriwether and would not give her estrogen treatment. As a result, Meriwether suffered estrogen withdrawal symptoms. Meriwether was also segregated and was the victim of sexual harassment, which allegedly included prison officers forcing her to strip in front of other inmates. Meriwether sued various prison officials (defendants) for, among other things, violating her rights under the Eighth Amendment. On the prison officials’ motion, the district court dismissed Meriwether’s claim for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The court reasoned that there was no serious medical need involved and did not address Meriwether’s claims regarding the conduct of other inmates. Meriwether appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cummings, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership