Merola v. Exergen Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
668 N.E.2d 351 (1996)
- Written by John Caddell, JD
Facts
Exergen Corp. (defendant) is a close corporation that has been controlled since its inception by its president and founder, Francesco Pompei (defendant). Steven Merola (plaintiff) began working full-time at Exergen in 1982, with the understanding that he would have the opportunity to become a major shareholder of the company. During the years 1982 and 1983, Merola purchased over 5,000 shares of Exergen stock, first at $2.25 a share and then at $5 per share. He was later terminated without cause, though this was permissible under his contract. He sold his stock back to the company in 1991 for $17 per share. Merola sued Exergen and Pompei, arguing that by terminating him, Pompei breached the duty owed to Merola as a minority shareholder. The trial court found in Merola’s favor as to both parties. The appellate court affirmed the judgment against Pompei but dismissed the case as to Exergen. Pompei appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lynch, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
