Merrell v. United States
United States Supreme Court
463 U.S. 1230 (1983)
The Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted surveillance of a building in Detroit that was believed to be an operation site for illegal gambling. The surveillance exposed an illegal dice game. As a result, 13 people were charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 1955, which prohibits the conducting, financing, management, supervision, direction, or owning of all or part of an illegal-gambling business. Eight co-defendants, including the lessor of the premises, the game operator, three dealers, and three watchmen, pleaded guilty. Four of the five remaining co-defendants were acquitted of all charges based on a finding that the four co-defendants were mere bettors. The evidence established that the last co-defendant, Buster Merrell (defendant), served coffee to the bettors during the gambling operations, stacked tables and chairs after the games, and cleaned the gambling area. Merrell was convicted of the substantive offense of conducting an illegal-gambling business. Merrell appealed, claiming that his actions did not rise to the level of conducting an illegal-gambling business. The court of appeals held that the correct standard to use in evaluating Merrell’s guilt was whether Merrell had performed any act, duty, or function that was necessary or helpful to the operation of the enterprise. Merrell petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
Dissent (White, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.