Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Bradley

756 F.2d 1048 (1985)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Bradley

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
756 F.2d 1048 (1985)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

Kenneth Bradley (defendant) was an account executive for Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (Merrill Lynch) (plaintiff). Bradley had signed an account-executive agreement stating that all client-information records were Merrill Lynch property at all times during and after an executive’s employment with the company. Executives could not remove records or copies from company property or discuss the information outside of conducting business. If executives were terminated, they were prohibited from soliciting Merrill Lynch clients for one year after their end date. The agreement also provided that all disputes arising out of employment or termination would be settled through arbitration. Bradley also had to sign the New York Stock Exchange form, which required him to arbitrate any dispute arising between himself and a member organization like Merrill Lynch. Bradley resigned from Merrill Lynch, and on the same day, he allegedly called his clients and urged them to transfer business to his new employer. Merrill Lynch filed suit in federal district court and petitioned the court for a preliminary injunction to stop Bradley from soliciting former clients. Bradley moved to stay the injunction and compel arbitration. The district court granted the injunction pending arbitration and compelled the parties to arbitrate their dispute. Bradley appealed the district court’s granting of the injunction.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Chapman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership