Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe

United States Supreme Court
455 U.S. 130 (1982)


Facts

The Jicarilla Apache Tribe (Tribe) (defendant) resided in New Mexico. The Tribe executed a series of mineral leases with non-Indian companies (plaintiffs) to develop almost 70 percent of the land on the Tribe’s reservation. The leases were subject to New Mexico state taxes on oil and gas production. In 1976, the Tribe passed an ordinance adopting its own severance tax to impose on the leases, which it was permitted to do under the Tribe’s revised constitution. The United States Secretary of the Interior approved the ordinance. The non-Indian lessees brought two separate legal actions against the Tribe, seeking an injunction to prevent enforcement of the tax. The plaintiffs argued that the power of the Tribe to tax the leases stemmed from the Tribe’s authority to exclude the plaintiffs from tribal lands. Further, the plaintiffs argued that because the tax was not included in the initial leases, the Tribe could not impose the tax later. The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico found for the plaintiffs, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reversed, holding that the power to tax was within the Tribe’s sovereign powers.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Stevens, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.