Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Mesler v. Holly

318 So. 2d 530 (1975)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...

Mesler v. Holly

Florida District Court of Appeal

318 So. 2d 530 (1975)

Facts

Frederick Way created an inter vivos trust and named himself and Elaine Holly (defendant) as cotrustees. Way and Holly were also the trust’s beneficiaries for the rest of their lives. After both Way and Holly died, the trust’s remaining assets would go to Way’s great-grandchildren (plaintiffs). However, while Holly was alive, the declaration of trust stated that the trustees had “absolute discretion” to spend the trust’s principal and income as necessary to maintain the standard of living to which Holly was accustomed. Two years later, Way died, and his residuary estate was placed into the trust. O. Ray Gussler (defendant) replaced Way as Holly’s cotrustee, but Holly performed most of the trust’s management. Way’s great-grandchildren sued Holly and Gussler for violating their duties as trustees to protect the trust’s assets for the trust’s remaindermen, i.e., the great-grandchildren. Specifically, the great-grandchildren claimed that Holly and Gussler had distributed more of the trust’s principal to Holly than was necessary to maintain the lifestyle that Holly had when the trust was created. The trial court found that the trust’s grant of absolute discretion meant that Holly and Gussler had no duty to spend the trust’s assets reasonably or to try to save any assets for the trust’s remaindermen. Because Holly and Gussler had no duties that they could have breached, the trial court dismissed the case. The great-grandchildren appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McNulty, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,400 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership