Messer v. Huntington Anesthesia Group
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
218 W. Va. 4, 620 S.E.2d 144 (2005)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
Theresa Messer (plaintiff) was a nurse anesthetist employed by Huntington Anesthesia Group, Inc. (Huntington) (defendant) from 1988 through 2000. Throughout her employment with Huntington, Messer suffered from a herniated disc that limited her ability to lift, stand, and perform her work. Messer’s physician advised Huntington that Messer should not work more than eight hours per day and should refrain from working overtime. Messer claimed that Huntington failed to accommodate her disability and the restrictions imposed by the doctor and that, as a result, her condition worsened to the point at which she was no longer able to work at all. Messer sued Huntington under the West Virginia Human Rights Act (human-rights act), and the circuit court dismissed Messer’s complaint, finding that the state’s workers’-compensation law provided the exclusive remedy for Messer’s injuries. Messer appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Benjamin, J.)
Dissent (Maynard, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.